| Priority Rank |
2005-06 PY Goals/BP # |
Objectives |
Status |
| |
GOAL 1 |
NASCIO IS THE PREMIER NETWORK AND RESOURCE FOR STATE CIOS |
|
| |
Objective 1.1 |
Lead the community of practice for government CIOs |
|
| |
Objective 1.2 |
Provide tools and cultivate relationships that support CIO success as enablers of state business agendas |
|
| |
Objective 1.3 |
Facilitate the exchange of inter-governmental solutions and standards |
|
| |
Objective 1.4 |
Leverage the experience of members to anticipate and respond to changes in the environment |
|
| |
| |
GOAL 2 |
CIOS ARE KEY MEMBERS OF STATEWIDE LEADERSHIP TEAMS |
|
| |
Objective 2.1 |
Advance the value of CIOs as advisors on information technology policy, investments and implementation |
|
| |
Objective 2.2 |
Promote business process improvements and integration |
|
| |
| |
GOAL 3 |
NASCIO IS AN EFFECTIVE ADVOCATE FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AT ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT |
|
| |
Objective 3.1 |
Serve as the preeminent source for state information technology policy and best practices for government leaders |
|
| |
Objective 3.2 |
Develop relationships and partnerships with strategic associations and policy advocates |
|
Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 1.3.1; 2.14
Performance Indicators: Effectiveness of national policy agenda and CIO participation
Improvements: NASCIO cybersecurity language in Homeland Security Appropriations approved by Senate & House; passed out of conference without changes.
Testimony provided to Senate HS/GA Subcommittee. P9olicy planning and Fly-in communications much improved.
Action Recommended:
- Continue to focus federal efforts with specific action plans per tiered approach
- Address how best to support state legislative efforts
- Check balance of resources for NASCIO's state and federal advocacy activities
|
|
Goals/Obj./Outcomes: 1.3.2; 1.4.1; 3.1.1; 3.2.1
Performance Indicators:Perceived credibility for constituents; type and "quality" or level of NASCIO partnerships with related orgs & CIO offices; co-branding
Improvements: $250K supplement to ISI grant received from DoJ extending efforts through 3/2008. Focus/distribution of resources per Tier 1 orgs continues to improve. Significant interactions this qtr: NASBO, NGA, E-health, NAPHIT, and US Access Board. Research/issue briefs & all-state calls volume maintained. Potential webinar solution in progress.
Action Recommended:
- ID balance b/w overall exposure of NASCIO brand; cultivate formal NASCIO partnership opportunities
|
Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 3.1.3
Performance Indicators: 50% fund balance; caliber of staff resources
Improvements: FY06 YE statement confirms association is financially solid; investment policy/approach updated allowing for improved returns; issue coordinator vacancy filled
Action Recommended:
- Increase member awareness re: staff resources and services.
|
|
Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 2.1.2; 2.13; 2.2.1
Performance Indicators: CIO roles, challenges & authorities are understood by policymakers; CIO scope of responsibilities; extent of NASCIO interaction with policy-makers [Address obj. & meas. in strategic plan.]
Improvements: Increasing number of states represented in association leadership.
Caution: Approx. 20 CIOs at risk due to fall elections
Action Recommended:
- Transition planning/communication re: new CIO appointers/appointees - collaborate with NGA.
|
Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 1.2.1; 2.2.2; 3.1.2
Performance Indicators: NASCIO consumers deem content relevant; PM practices gaining; national recognition of outstanding business leaders and practices
Action Recommended:
- Establish more time for CIO-only meetings
- Address formal facilitation/promotion re: re-use of best practices
- Improve response rate on conference evaluations
|
|
Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 1.1.1; 1.1.2; 1.2.2
Performance Indicators: Retention rates for each membership level; member participation; member and sponsors determine that NASCIO services are effective and efficient
Caution: 43 state memberships current to date. Track to reach current target of 80 members; M&A will continue to be a factor, but retention numbers offset by new members. Sponsorship participation is at an all-time high, but state:corporate participation ratio is a concern.
Action Recommended:
- Continue to strive for consistency in member CRM; peer participation in CIO orientation; tracking depth of member participation from perspective of NASCIO activities and CIO offices themselves.
- Work with CLC to develop corporate value statement.
|
Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 1.1.1; 1.4.2; 2.2.3
Performance Indicators: Members indicate NASCIO's ability to anticipate issues meets their needs, as do products and services overall; EA adoption is advanced in the states
Improvements: # of topical, all-state conference calls & issue briefs maintained; marketing improvements have led to reuse and expansion of citations by other groups; listserv activity continues to increase.
Action Recommended:
- Consider state EA consortium support per grant funding
- Conduct point of service surveys for member feedback
|
|
|
