Home    |    Site Map    |    Privacy    |    Contact Us    |    RSSSubscribe
aboutNASCIO
Email This Page     |     Print This Page     |    
Comments?     |     Share This Link

ABOUT NASCIO   |   Program Management

2nd Quarter Report 2007 (April-June)

NASCIO's Mission: to foster government excellence through quality business practices, information management, and technology policy.

Measuring Performance

Priority Rank 2006-07 PY Goals/BP # Objectives Status
  GOAL 1 NASCIO IS THE PREMIER NETWORK AND RESOURCE FOR STATE CIOS  
  Objective 1.1 Strengthen state CIOs awareness of strategic IT issues and solutions  
  Objective 1.2 Promote the adoption of IT best practices and innovations  
  Objective 1.3 Promote the sharing of experiences and expertise between members  
  Objective 1.4 Improve our performance in fulfilling all goals  
 
  GOAL 2 ADVANCE STATE CIOS AS KEY MEMBERS OF THE LEADERSHIP TEAM  
  Objective 2.1 Develop transition planning, processes and mentoring tactics for new state CIOs  
  Objective 2.2 Continue to advance the role of the state CIO as the policy and business leader of IT  
  Objective 2.3 Identify opportunities to reinforce the role of the state CIO  
  Objective 2.4 Recognize leadership, innovation and best practices in state information technology  
 
  GOAL 3 NASCIO IS AN EFFECTIVE ADVOCATE FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AT ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT  
  Objective 3.1 Strengthen and deepen existing relationships with key strategic partners to advance NASCIO's mission  
  Objective 3.2 Promote and advocate the role of state CIO as the principal oversight of state IT resources and policies to the Federal executive branch  
  Objective 3.3 Advance the states' cybersecurity agenda and protection of critical state IT infrastructure  
  Objective 3.4 Support the policy imperative for continued progress in public sector interoperability  
  Objective 3.5 Promote cross-boundary initiatives, solutions and relationships with states and local government jurisdictions  

Key
  All perf. indicators are satisfied or on track (scope, schedule, budget, resources)
  One critical indicator is off track, but majority of perf. indicators are satisfactory; developing remediation plans
  Multiple indicators are off track; contingency plan needed

Vital Signs Dashboard

NASCIO uses a modified scorecard approach to map the goals outlined in the association's strategic plan: tracking performance through a series of "vital signs" illustrated in the following dashboard.


Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 3.3; 3.4
Performance Indicators: Effectiveness of national policy agenda and CIO participation
Improvements: Process improvements from 2006 Fly-In; more positive engagement with DHS CS&T
Action Recommended:
  • Monitor progress with Fly-In call to action
  • Continued participation in DHS SSP activities.
  • Continued involvement in NPSTC
  • Timely review of Federal orders and proposals
 

Goals/Obj./Outcomes:3.1; 3.2; 3.5
Performance Indicators:Perceived credibility for constituents; type and "quality" or level of NASCIO partnerships with related orgs & CIO offices; co-branding
Improvements: Six strategic partner briefings completed during D.C.Fly-In.
Action Recommended:
  • Complete the analysis of the survey on Federal funding experiences
  • Define potential solutions to IT funding reform
  • Seek opportunities for CIOs and ED to speak at partner conferences and events
  • Expand interactions with local government associations

Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 1.4.2
Performance Indicators: 50% fund balance; caliber of staff resources; year to date surplus; year to date reserve; dues payments year to date; investment portfolio performance.
Improvements: End of year financial status positive
Action Recommended:
  • Monitor investment portfolio
  • Quarterly status reviews of workplan
 

Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 2.1,2.1.2, 2.2, 2.3
Performance Indicators: CIO roles, challenges & authorities understood by policymakers; CIO scope of responsibilities; extent of NASCIO policy interaction
Improvements: Improved tracking of NASCIO brand equity using web analytics
Caution: Continue to follow relationship management timeline
Action Recommended:
  • More timely communications with new CIOs
  • Carefully monitor opportunities to promote and ensure protection of NASCIO brand

Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 1.1, 1.2,1.3
Performance Indicators: NASCIO consumers deem content relevant; PM practices gaining; national recognition of outstanding business leaders and practices
Improvements:E-Discovery Working Group initiated.
Caution: Best Practices and Innovation Working Group has not met goals
Action Recommended:
  • Investigate opportunities for additional All-State calls on topics of importance
  • Stimulate completion of deliverables from Working Groups
 

Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 1.4, 2.2.2
Performance Indicators: : Retention rates for each membership level; member participation; member and sponsors determine that NASCIO services are effective and efficient
Improvements:Sponsor revenue target achieved; Midyear Conference evaluations positive
Action Recommended:
  • Analyze and rationalize sponsorship benefits - seek additional
  • Revise state member satisfaction survey for execution in 3rd Quarter
  • Update state member participation report

Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 1.1.2
Performance Indicators: Members indicate NASCIO's ability to anticipate issues meets their needs, as do products and services overall; EA adoption is advancing in the states
Improvements:New format for briefs adopted. Improved web analytics solution implemented on website to track research distribution
Action Recommended:
  • Investigate improved webinar solution
  • Improved web analytics reporting required
   

Staff contact: Doug Robinson, Executive Director
Phone: (859) 514-9153
E-mail: drobinson@AMRms.com

.
Innovative Funding for State IT: Models, Trends, and Perspectives State IT Workforce: Here Today, Gone Tomorrow? Information Exchange Catalog