ABOUT NASCIO | Program Management
3rd Quarter Report 2008 (July - September)
NASCIO's Mission: to foster government excellence through quality business practices, information management, and technology policy.Measuring Performance
| Priority Rank | 2007-08 PY Goals / BP # | Objectives | Status |
| GOAL 1 | NASCIO IS THE PREMIER NETWORK AND RESOURCE FOR STATE CIOS | ||
| Objective 1.1 | Improve state CIO's awareness of strategic information technology issues and solutions | ![]() |
|
| Objective 1.2 | Identify information technology best practices and innovations, and promote their adoption | ![]() |
|
| Objective 1.3 | Facilitate the sharing of experiences and expertise between members | ![]() |
|
| GOAL 2 | ADVANCE STATE CIOS AS KEY MEMBERS OF THE LEADERSHIP TEAM | ||
| Objective 2.1 | Promote transition planning, processes and mentoring tactics for new state CIOs | ![]() |
|
| Objective 2.2 | Continue to advance the role of the state CIO as the policy and business leader of IT | ![]() |
|
| Objective 2.3 | Identify opportunities to reinforce the role of the state CIO | ![]() |
|
| Objective 2.4 | Recognize leadership, innovation and best practices in state information technology | ![]() |
|
| GOAL 3 | NASCIO IS AN EFFECTIVE ADVOCATE FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AT ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT | ||
| Objective 3.1 | Strengthen and deepen existing relationships with key strategic partners to advance NASCIO's mission | ![]() |
|
| Objective 3.2 | Promote and advocate the role of state CIO as the principal oversight of state IT resources and policies to the Federal executive branch | ![]() |
|
| Objective 3.3 | Promote cross-boundary initiatives, solutions and relationships | ![]() |
|
| Objective 3.4 | Seek funding for developing and protecting the information technology infrastructure of the 21st century | New |
|
| Objective 3.5 | Promote and communicate the critical role of information technology in the operation and continuity of state government | New |
|
| Key | |
| All perf. indicators are satisfied or on track (scope, schedule, budget, resources) | |
| One critical indicator is off track, but majority of perf. indicators are satisfactory; developing remediation plans | |
| Multiple indicators are off track; contingency plan needed | |
Vital Signs Dashboard
NASCIO uses a modified scorecard approach to map the goals outlined in the association's strategic plan: tracking performance through a series of "vital signs" illustrated in the following dashboard.![]() Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 3.3; 3.4 Performance Indicators: Effectiveness of national policy agenda and CIO participation Outcomes: 2008 call for action adopted and used for Fly-In message; Report language included in Senate Appropriations Bill; S3460 introduced Action Recommended:
| ![]() Goals/Obj./Outcomes:3.1; 3.2; 3.5 Performance Indicators:Perceived credibility for constituents; type and "quality" or level of NASCIO partnerships with related orgs & CIO offices; co-branding Outcomes: : Improved relationship with strategic partners Action Recommended:
|
|
![]() Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 1.4.2 Performance Indicators: 50% fund balance; caliber of staff resources; year to date surplus; year to date reserve; dues payments year to date; investment portfolio performance. Outcomes: Major structural changes to workplan and budget; Corporate membership increasing. State dues on track. Caution: : Performance of long term investment portfolio impacted by weak market conditions Action Recommended:
|
![]() Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 2.1,2.1.2, 2.2, 2.3 Performance Indicators: CIO roles, challenges & authorities understood by policymakers; CIO scope of responsibilities; extent of NASCIO policy interaction Outcomes: Expanded awareness of state CIO role through press coverage and other avenues Action Recommended:
|
|
![]() Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 1.1, 1.2,1.3 Performance Indicators: NASCIO consumers deem content relevant; PM practices gaining; national recognition of outstanding business leaders and practices Outcomes: Increased citation of NASCIO research briefs; Conference attendance high; annual conference evaluations positive; increased exposure to award recipients Action Recommended:
|
![]() Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 1.4, 2.2.2 Performance Indicators:: Retention rates for each membership level; member participation; member and sponsors determine that NASCIO services are effective and efficient Outcomes: State member renewal on target; corporate membership at record level; annual conference sponsorship target exceeded Action Recommended:
|
|
![]() Goals/Objectives/Outcomes: 1.1.2 Performance Indicators: Members indicate NASCIO's ability to anticipate issues meets their needs, as do products and services overall; EA adoption is advancing in the states Outcomes: Strong portfolio of issues briefs released; all state call on Health IT Action Recommended:
|
Staff contact: Doug Robinson, Executive Director
Phone: (859) 514-9153
E-mail: drobinson@AMRms.com


















