COMMITTEES | State Digital Identity Working Group
- About | Roster | Publications | Links
About the Working Group
Issue Statement: Federal, state, local, and tribal governments currently issue numerous credentials to constituents for access to facilities or services based on a variety of endorsements. Many of the endorsements provide citizens with access to federally funded programs, but the issuance of credentials remains program-specific and has become a redundant process for many agencies and departments. By issuing a digital identity that has multi-platform credentialing options, it will result in improved efficiency and convenience for both users and issuers. To the extent such credential is honored by commercial entities, it will also improve efficiency and security of commercial transactions, including on-line transactions.In an effort to lower the amount of data breaches and curtail identity theft, effective policies must enable trust across organizational, operational, physical, and network boundaries. The resulting framework will promote data security, privacy, and the high assurance authentication needed to secure information sharing and transparency in government. Guidance on the approach to identity management will encourage a shift away from stove-piped applications to an enterprise view of identity that enables use without creating redundant sources that are difficult to protect and keep current.
Purpose: The State Digital Identity Work Group will provide a consensus based forum that enables State Chief Information Officers (CIOs), Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs), Enterprise Architects and line of business stakeholders to collaborate on developing recommendations on federated identity management initiatives. This working group intends to provide a framework for the key guidelines for program management and collaboration. The charter seeks to develop solutions for a sustainable and supportable model for use in identity, credentialing, and access efforts.
Goals and Objectives:
- Promote the use of an enterprise architecture governance structure
- Distinguish appropriate capabilities for identifying, authenticating, and authorizing individuals appropriate access to resources
- Enable trust and interoperability
- Improve security and privacy
- Facilitate e-government use by facilitating secure access to services and transactions
- Increase efficiencies and reduce costs
- Facilitate efficiency and security of commercial transactions
- Seek to find ways to expand convenience of services while improving security and privacy
- Investigate the short-term and long-term sustainability of a state digital identity program
Committee Roster
Co-Chair:Peter Hastings, State of New Hampshire |
Co-Chair:Calvin Rhodes, State of Georgia |
|
George Allen, MorphoTrust Daniel Arnold, Commonwealth of Kentucky Erik Avakian, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania David Ballard, CenturyLink Glen Bellomy, Symantec Michael Berman, Datacard John Biccum, Microsoft Deborah Blanchard, Verizon Claudia Boldman, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Renee Brand, Oracle USA Inc. Scott Bream, State of Washington Chris Buse, State of Minnesota Tom Calvert, Intel Paul Cartland, State of Alaska Steve Casey, State of Connecticut Charles Cephas, Symantec Victor Chakravarty, State of Maine Patti Chapman, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Mr. Paul Christman, Quest Software Glen Coleman, State of Ohio Greg Coleman, Harris Corporation Nancy Collins, Xerox Todd Crosby, State of Hawai'i Sam Curry, EMC Corporation Denise Cushaney, CDW-G Stu Davis, State of Ohio Justin Dew, ActivIdentity Mark DiFraia, MorphoTrust Chris Dixon, Deltek Kevin M Doty, HP Andre Eaddy, Unisys Scot R Ellsworth, State of Michigan Julie Evans, Center for Internet Security Lane Feingold, Motorola Solutions Angela Fultz Nordstrom, NIC Amit Gandre, Deloitte Consulting LLP Chris Gardner, SecureKey Technologies Mr. Scott Glover, Deloitte Consulting LLP Chad Grant, NASCIO Brad Hanscom, BerryDunn Tim Hanson, State of Minnesota Mitch Herckis, NASCIO Karyn Higa-Smith, US Department of Homeland Security John Hogan, IBM Daniel Hudson, Datacard Randy Hultman, State of Delaware Judy Keator, HP Rodney I Kimura, State of Hawai'i Agnes Kirk, State of Washington | Peter Kirkwood, MorphoTrust Sriram Krishnan, Good Technology David N Kroening, State of New York Paul Laurent, Oracle USA Inc. Sue Ann Lipinski, State of West Virginia Thomas Lockwood, Professional & Executive Services, LLC Daniel J Lohrmann, State of Michigan William MacLafferty, State of Georgia Mike Malik, State of Delaware Sanjay Menon, Accenture Dennis W Miller, State of Oregon Krishna Mohan, Commonwealth of Kentucky Hope Morgan, State of Texas Frank Morrow, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Mr. Robert A Myles, Symantec Matthew Neuman, Giesecke & Devrient Cathy Novak, Pegasystems Inc. Dr. Craig P Orgeron, PhD, State of Mississippi Mr. Stephan Papadopulos, District of Columbia Kym Patterson, State of Arkansas Brendan M Peter, CA Technologies Zeca Pires, Datacard Andy Pitman, Microsoft Danka Prilepkova, State of Delaware Mark Reardon, State of Georgia Mr. Richard Reasner, State of Michigan Jennifer Reed, IBM James A Richards, III, State of West Virginia Doug Robinson, NASCIO Tim Robyn, State of Missouri Mr. Juan E Rodriguez de Hostos, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Michael Roling, State of Missouri Renault Ross, Symantec Jim Salb, State of Delaware John Santisteban, ActivIdentity Dan Schutzer, Financial Services Roundtable Eric Simon, HP Geoffrey Slagle, American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators Jamie Snedaker, MorphoTrust Chris Stanley, State of New York Dave Strazzeri, State of New York Srini Subramanian, Deloitte Consulting LLP Kathleen Synstegaard, Datacard Lisa Thompson, NASCIO Meredith Ward, NASCIO Samantha Wenger, NASCIO David Williams, State of West Virginia Mike Wyatt, Deloitte Consulting LLP |
Links
