COMMITTEES   |   Enterprise Architecture and Governance Committee

About the Committee

The NASCIO Enterprise Architecture program was developed to enable the mission of state and local government. Government must continually reinvent itself to remain relevant by effectively and efficiently providing services to the citizens of this country. The path to this continual transformation must embrace leadership, management, coordination, communication and technology throughout government. Enterprise architecture is the discipline to appropriately define and leverage these capabilities within the complexities of government.

Committee Roster

Co-Chair: Jack Doane, State of Alabama

Co-Chair: Carolyn Parnell, State of Minnesota

Kevin Acker, State of Wisconsin Doug Alt, State of Ohio Steve Ambrosini, IJIS Institute Ed Arabas, State of Oregon Patricia Arcano, ActivIdentity Tom Baden, State of Minnesota David Ballard, CenturyLink Dave Barber, Software AG Dave Barber, Software AG Tim Bass, John Bastin, HP Glen Bellomy, Symantec DeLaine Bender, NASCIO Chris Bennett, District of Columbia Rishi Bhaskar, Motorola Solutions Ron Brodhead, Symantec Donita Brown, State of Tennessee Scott Came, SEARCH Charles Cephas, Symantec Victor Chakravarty, State of Maine Greg Cheetham, Intel Mr. Paul Christman, Quest Software Anthony Collins, State of Delaware John Copple, Sanborn Rob Culp, IBM Shell Culp, State of California Patricia Cummens, ESRI Matthew D'Alessandro, Motorola Solutions Vinay Dattu, State of Tennessee Mark Dixon, IBM John Dolejsi, SAS Institute Bryan Dreiling, State of Kansas Edward J Driesse, State of Louisiana Ric Dugger, State of Florida Brad Dupuy, HP Mr. Tim Durniak, IBM Kelley Eich, State of Colorado Scot R Ellsworth, State of Michigan Scott D Fairholm, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Lauren Farese, Oracle USA Inc. Michael Fenton, State of North Carolina Bill Ferguson, State of Colorado Graeme Finley, Grant Thornton LLP Tim Finnegan, SAS Institute Eileen Fitzsimmons, State of New York Mr. Andy Ford, NIC Jeremy Forman, Oracle USA Inc. Thomas Fruman, State of Georgia Emily Gallt, NASCIO Brien Green, Bentley Systems Inc. Jason Gunnoe, State of Tennessee Sherri Hammons, State of Colorado Marcia Hansen, State of Minnesota Marcia Hansen, State of Minnesota Viann Hardy, MAXIMUS Inc. Deborah Henderson, DAMA International Mary Hill-Hartman, IBM Richard Hillyard, Fujitsu Network Communications Nadine Hoffman, Commonwealth of Virginia Michael N Hogarth, ESI International Kennan Hogg, Software AG Samuel Holcman, Enterprise Architecture Center Of Excellence Doug Holt, State of Texas Randy Hughes, State of Utah Antonio Hylton, Verizon Christopher Ipsen, State of Nevada Greg Jones, IBM

Kent E. Klitzke, HP David N Kroening, State of New York Mr. Charles Knapp Leadbetter, III, BerryDunn Leah Lewis, Cisco Systems Inc. Sue Ann Lipinski, State of West Virginia Daniele Loffreda, Fujitsu Network Communications Daniel J Lohrmann, State of Michigan Alisanne Maffei, State of Nevada Dilby Malakar, DAMA International Mark McChesney, Commonwealth of Kentucky Bob McDonough, State of Michigan Laurel McMillan, State of Washington Greg McNeal, State of Maine Kristen Miller, Deloitte Consulting LLP Jim Mills, State of South Carolina Linda Misegadis, Kronos Inc. Mary Mondragon, Avaya Inc Kathy Moore, State of West Virginia Michael K Morey, State of Vermont Barry Moultrie, L-3 STRATIS David O'Berry, McAfee Paulina Orlikowski, HP Jeanne Owings, Crowe Horwath LLP Andris Ozols, State of Michigan Dan Paolini, State of New Jersey John Paulson, State of Minnesota Bethann Pepoli, EMC Corporation Eric Perkins, Commonwealth of Virginia Judson Person, State of Minnesota Dugan Petty, State of Oregon Randy Phares, Software AG Glenn Plomchok, Software AG Holli Ploog, CGI Technologies & Solutions Inc. Scott Pollack, Deloitte Consulting LLP Sharon Poulalion, State of South Carolina Mary Lou Prevost, CA Technologies John Punzak, Red Hat Scott Riordan, State of Oregon Van Ristau, DLT Solutions Inc Charles Robb, NASCIO Doug Robinson, NASCIO Christina Rogers, State of California Jim Salb, State of Delaware Lauren Sallata, ACS Government Solutions Dr. Jill Satran, State of Washington Dana Schafer, State of Michigan Eric Simon, HP Jason Snyder, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Christopher Sullivan, Teradata Morey Sullivan, Alexander Open Systems Eric Sweden, NASCIO Glenn Thomas, Commonwealth of Kentucky Ron Thomas, State of Missouri Christopher Traver, US Department of Justice Christopher Traver, US Department of Justice Scott Utley, State of Arkansas Carlos Valarezo, Symantec Ted Van Ryn, Fujitsu Network Communications John Vittner, State of Connecticut Tom Walters, Commonwealth of Kentucky Thomas Warner, CA Technologies Paul Warren Douglas, State of Washington Greg Wass, Cook County Government Dan Widner, Commonwealth of Virginia Robert D Woolley, State of Utah Richard Young, Microsoft

Committee Publications

• Publications Archive

Capitals in the Clouds Part III – Recommendations for Mitigating Risks: Jurisdictional, Contracting and Service Levels
December 2011

Cloud computing will continue to be an invaluable resource for state and local governments in their efforts to rationalize and optimize computing resources. Cloud computing should be seen as an IT innovation that can support rationalization and optimization of business services as well as IT services. Due diligence prescribes the necessity of exploring and evaluating jurisdictional issues in order to ensure long term sustainability and growing adoption of collaborative government operations in state and local government.

State CIO Top Ten Policy and Technology Priorities for 2012
October 2011

Each year NASCIO conducts a survey of the state CIOs to identify and prioritize the top policy and technology issues facing state government. The top ten priorities are identified and used as input to NASCIO’s programs, planning for conference sessions, and publications.

Capitals in the Clouds - The Case for Cloud Computing in State Government Part II: Challenges and Opportunities to Get Your Data Right
October 2011

Cloud computing brings with it opportunities, issues and risks. One major consideration that must be addressed is the management of data – governance, stewardship, consistency, ownership and security. Data is the lifeblood of state government operations and critical for service delivery. With the fiscal stress and operational pressures that are driving state and local governments toward serious consideration and adoption of cloud computing, the data must not be ignored. These pressures must be managed intelligently to avoid pushing government into a future situation that could constitute greater cost, and more difficulty in achieving interoperability of government lines of business and government jurisdictions.

Capitals in the Clouds - The Case for Cloud Computing in State Government Part I: Definitions and Principles
June 2011

Cloud computing has arrived as a serious alternative for state government. There are outstanding issues that must be faced and dealt with in order to maintain the reliability, responsibility, security, privacy, and citizen-confidence in government services. Government is exploring technology and business process innovations that will make the way for government to deliver existing services more economically. Cloud computing provides a number capabilities that have the potential for enabling such innovation.

A Call to Action: Information Exchange Strategies for Effective State Government
April 2011

NASCIO Recommends State Government Adopt the National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) to Enable Government Information Sharing
 
The National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) provides a broad range of products and capabilities for planning and implementing enterprise-wide information exchanges. Government effectiveness and citizen centric government services require effective cross line of business collaboration and communication. Use of national standards will avoid redundant investment and unnecessary variation. What is needed is a common discipline for information sharing that is employed by all government lines of business.  NIEM exists as that discipline for federal, state and local government.

DO YOU THINK? OR DO YOU KNOW? PART II: The EA Value Chain, The Strategic Intent Domain, and Principles
September 2010
Investment in business intelligence and business analytics must be driven by enterprise strategic intent. Proper leverage of analytics should start with a clear understanding of the outcomes state government is trying to achieve. This issue brief presents the rationale for analytics using the NASCIO Enterprise Architecture Value Chain as a framework for organizing the thinking and the questions which eventually drive investment in analytics capabilities. It builds on the foundational concepts discussed in NASCIO’s first issue brief on this subject, and strongly recommends an enterprise approach. Without an enterprise approach to analytics, investment across the enterprise is un-orchestrated and uncoordinated. That creates redundant investment in tools and training, and creates barriers to cross line of business collaboration. State government can not afford redundant and disconnected investment. One of the values of enterprise architecture is the management, optimization and simplification of investment within state government. Proper investment and application of analytics is essential to deploying effective and efficient government services. Finally, the level of complexity of analytical methods and tools depends on the complexity of the decisions and the issues.

DO YOU THINK? OR DO YOU KNOW? Improving State Government Operations Through Business Analytics
February 2010
Business analytics provides an evidence-based approach for decision making. With the current emphasis on transparency and visibility into the operations of government, government leaders need to anticipate more questions and evaluation related to not only what decisions are being made, but also what rationale was applied in making those decisions. As stated in this issue brief, intuition alone is not adequate for evaluating alternatives and making decisions. Effective implementation of a business analytics capability will promote an enterprise-wide culture of fact-based decision making. State government is encouraged to seriously look at business analytics as a means for fully understanding current circumstances and make predictions about the future. The predictive nature is particularly important as we continue to face ongoing fiscal challenges and increasing demand for state government services.

Data Governance Part III: Frameworks – Structure for Organizing Complexity
May 2009
This issue brief presents the concept of frameworks that describes what constitutes a data governance program, with a focus on frameworks from the Data Management Association (DAMA), the Data Governance Institute (DGI), and IBM. Use of frameworks can assist state government in planning and executing on an effective data governance initiative. They assist in achieving completeness in a program. In any subject or discipline frameworks and maturity models assist in describing the scope – both breadth and depth – of an initiative. This holds true as well for data, information and knowledge management.

Data Governance Part II: Maturity Models – A Path to Progress
March 2009
Data governance maturity models provide a foundational reference for understanding data governance and for understanding the journey that must be anticipated and planned for achieving effective governance of data, information and knowledge assets. This report continues to build on the concepts presented in Data Governance Part I. It presents a portfolio of data governance maturity models.

Enterprise Architecture Video Library

NASCIO’s architecture videos are intended to serve as a resource for CIOs, architects and other IT experts in their efforts to present a compelling message describing the value of enterprise architecture. They may also be used in new employee orientation and the introduction of enterprise architecture concepts to policy makers, government staff, and potentially the public. This four volume set includes two videos previously released by NASCIO. Two additional videos were produced that direct the message of enterprise architecture toward policy makers and technical professionals, respectively. The complete video series provide a library of messages that can be selected based on the audience and intent of the presenter. Funding for the project was provided by a grant from the U.S. Department of Justice, the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs.

In Hot Pursuit: Achieving Interoperability Through XML
October 2004
CD version is higher quality than the streaming version.

Digital Government
January 2004

Architecture: A Blueprint for Better Government
January 2004

Enterprise Architecture – Government Leader Perspective
January 2004

Enterprise Architecture – Information Technology Professional Perspective
January 2004

Enterprise Architecture Related Resources:

• Global Justice Reference Architecture (JRA) for Service Oriented Architecture
• Justice Information Sharing Resource Directory - An on-line directory of tools that support the development, design, and implementation of strategies to improve justice information sharing. (April 2005)
• NASCIO Catalog for Information Exchanges
• The NIEM exchange development methodology – National Information Exchange Model
  
  • Online NIEM Implementer's Course
  • Download Course Module slides
• Performance Measurement for Justice Information System Projects
  A practical guide for establishing performance measure for information sharing projects

Strategic Partners:

• Center for Technology in Government
  • Sharing Justice Information: A Capability Assessment Toolkit
• Federation of Enterprise Architecture Professional Organizations
  
  • The Federation of Enterprise Architecture Professional Organizations (FEAPO) is an association of professional organizations whose members have an active interest in the practice and professionalism of Enterprise Architecture. FEAPO provides a forum to facilitate collaboration and coordination of activities among Enterprise Architecture (EA) related professional organizations, to work toward a better integrated community and "one face" for the advancement of the practice and profession of Enterprise Architecture. The advent of FEAPO has been welcomed the world over because there is a strong desire among practitioners and organizations in many countries to professionalize and advance the field of enterprise architecture. The FEAPO membership list provides a comprehensive list of domestic and international organizations focused on enterprise architecture. Learn more at http://www.feapo.org/
• Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative
  
• The IJIS Institute
• SEARCH: The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics
  • The Justice Information Exchange Model Tool
• U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance
  

Enterprise Architecture Related Websites:

• Data Management International
  
  • The Data Management Body of Knowledge (DMBOK)
• The Data Administration Newsletter
• The FEAC Institute
• The Institute For Enterprise Architecture Developments (IFEAD)
• The Zachman Institute for Framework Advancement

This information was prepared under the leadership, guidance, and funding of the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, in collaboration with NASCIO. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.